Immigration, Politics, Supreme Court

How Come Mexico Can Require Voters To Prove Citizenship And Arizona Can’t?

The Supreme Court has ruled that it was bad for the state of Arizona to require proof of citizenship for voters. In a serious country, this wouldn’t even be an issue. And illegal_aliensit isn’t—in Mexico.

Learn how Motor Voter (1993) was so important to voter fraud and, why the Supreme Court still prohibits States to show proof of citizenship to vote.

Link: Memo From Middle America | How Come Mexico Can Require Voters To Prove Citizenship And Arizona Can’t? | VDARE.com.

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
Spread the love

Related Posts

  • Mexico's Tourist Industry Now Targeted

    Heads are rolling in Mexico, literally. Eleven decapitated bodies have been found outside the city of Merida on the Yucatan peninsula, heightening fears that Mexico's recent descent into violence has…

  • One-Issue Voters Make Minority Parties

    The next election will most certainly be determined by these 'one-issue' voters if they don't wise up and look at the big picture. The main difference between the one-issue voters…

  • Life, Citizenship, And Pay Grade

    There seems to be another issue that is above President Obama's pay grade. Citizenship. At what turned out to be the best of all the presidential debates hosted by Pastor…

Powered By Related Posts for WordPress