Ending the war before it is won, which is all the democrats in Washington have been talking about, just hit a snag.  Having a chance to do it decisively by not funding it just slipped away. They only got 29 votes in favor, where 60 would have been needed to override a veto. Nineteen democrats voted against ending funding for the war, and twenty-eight democrats voted to end funding by March 31, 2008.  So, what does that say about the so-called mandate that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi claim got them in the majority? It all kind of goes up in smoke. It’s exactly what you get when you kowtow to the far left Soros groups instead of ‘the people.’Â
They deceived themselves into believing that they got elected to END the war. Taking their money and advice from the Soros wing of the party, and having absolutely no convictions of their own, I can see how they got that way. They don’t want the war to end yet. Not until they have used it politically to the fullest extent possible, leading up to the ’08 election. End it now, then what if we get attacked in our homeland before the election?  It’s curtains for them for sure. It comes down to the democrats concentrating more on criticizing the administration than killing our enemy. For them, Iraq is just a political tool to use to gain political power. After all, it’s Bush’s war, not ours. Never mind the 6,400 + casualties so far. And never mind to our military families that have loved ones in harms way, doing the job we (democrats included) asked them to do.
Winning this war would be a snap if this bunch would only focus on our real enemy, as opposed to their enemy, republicans.