Now that a gallon of gas cost over $3, the news media is re-running the same news casts on this subject that they did last year. Well, not really but the tilt is the same, their message is the same, for all practical purposes they could re-play last years’ broadcasts on this subject. They continue to belabor the question for the great unwashed; why are gas prices so high?
That question is commonplace among the economically challenged who think supply and demand are obscure theories that contradict reality. They only look to gouging in one way or another. The question that should be posed, and hasn’t been is this; what have we done since last year to increase oil supply? How many new wells were licensed? Where has exploration begun? How many oil refineries have we built? What have we done to supply or demand to cause the price to come down? I like this one best, would we be more secure and would the price of gas be as high as it is today if, ten years ago, we had started drilling and expanding the oil and gas infrastructure ?
The population doing what populations do will increase demand on its own. Births outnumber deaths. We are now over 300 million strong, not counting the 12-20 million illegals. And right now Congress is attempting to slip an immigration bill over on us that will so radically change the demographics and politic of this country that guarantees over 100 million (the families of the 12 million) more Mexicans will be here driving cars.
The evidence of government actions points to a willingness to increase our population (demand) by the stroke of a pen, and absolutely no evidence to increase the oil supply to meet our current demands, let alone the effect (if enacted) this immigration bill will have on demand. How high will it have to go before the left understands economics? Is $6/gallon enough? You pay what you get for.
have been talking about, just
End it now, then what if we get attacked in our homeland before the election?  It’s curtains for them for sure. It comes down to the democrats concentrating more on criticizing the administration than killing our enemy. For them, Iraq is just a political tool to use to gain political power. After all, it’s Bush’s war, not ours. Never mind the 6,400 + casualties so far. And never mind to our military families that have loved ones in harms way, doing the job we (democrats included) asked them to do.
Katie’s brand is power legs and a stack of papers in her lap. A far cry from Walter Cronkite. I don’t see a racial component in this equation. Seems to me they are also in denial about why they have a paucity of minority news readers on the air. As for Katie, the Canadian cable news program called
this country they give awards for leaking state secrets. Â
Is it me or does there seem to be more positive news being reported on lately? Muharib Abdul-Latif al-Jubouri, the kidnapper of